Chapter 2.28
MUNICIPAL COURT1
Sections
2.28.010 Established – Jurisdiction.
2.28.020 Violations bureau established.
2.28.030 Municipal court judge.
2.28.040 Judge pro tem – Appointment.
2.28.050 Magistrate – Appointment.
2.28.080 Penalty for certain ordinance violations.
2.28.100 Public defender standards.
2.28.110 Municipal court seal.
2.28.010 Established – Jurisdiction.
Pursuant to chapter 3.50 RCW as presently constituted or as may be subsequently amended (Chapter 258, Laws of 1984) there is established a court of limited jurisdiction to be known and designated as a municipal court, entitled “The Municipal Court of the City of Des Moines,” which court shall have the authority and jurisdiction granted in Chapter 258, Laws of 1984, together with such other authority and jurisdiction as is generally conferred in this state by either common law or by express statute, currently in effect or as may be subsequently enacted, upon municipal courts so organized. [Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 610 § 1, 1984. Formerly 2.52.010.]
2.28.020 Violations bureau established.
There is established a violations bureau under the supervision of the municipal court, which shall function in accordance with the laws of the state. [Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 610 § 2, 1984. Formerly 2.52.020.]
2.28.030 Municipal court judge.
The municipal court judge holding office on January 1, 1985, shall continue to hold office until January 1, 1986. On or before December 1, 1985, the city manager shall appoint a successor municipal court judge, subject to confirmation by the city council, to take office on January 1, 1986. Subsequent appointments shall be made every fourth year in accordance with this section. The municipal court judge shall discharge the office in accordance with the laws of the state. [Ord. 1650 § 1, 2016; Ord. 1482 § 1, 2010: Ord. 1349 § 1, 2004: Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 610 § 3, 1984. Formerly 2.52.030.]
2.28.040 Judge pro tem – Appointment.
Judges pro tem may be appointed in accordance with the laws of the state. [Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 610 § 4, 1984. Formerly 2.52.040.]
2.28.050 Magistrate – Appointment.
The municipal court judge shall appoint a magistrate to hear and determine traffic infractions in which the defendant has requested a mitigating circumstances hearing pursuant to chapter 46.63 RCW. The magistrate shall possess the qualifications to hold the position of judge of the municipal court and shall serve at the pleasure of the municipal court judge. The municipal court judge may serve as magistrate. [Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 610 § 5, 1984. Formerly 2.52.050.]
2.28.060 Compensation.
Compensation for the municipal court judge and magistrate shall be set in the biennial budget ordinance of the City. Judges pro tem shall be compensated pro rata at the compensation rate of the municipal court judge. Commencing September 1, 2015, and thereafter on the first day of September of each successive year, the salary of the Des Moines municipal court judge shall automatically be adjusted to an amount equal to 95 percent of the salary of district court judges as set by the Washington Citizens’ Commission on Salaries for Elected Officials for the succeeding year. [Ord. 1793 § 3, 2024; Ord. 1624 § 1, 2015: Ord. 1349 § 2, 2004: Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 610 § 7, 1984. Formerly 2.52.060.]
2.28.070 Sessions.
Regular sessions of the municipal court shall be held as set by the municipal court judge and may be canceled only in accordance with the laws of the state. Special sessions of the municipal court may be set as the judge, in his or her discretion, may determine is necessary for the effective administration of the municipal court. [Ord. 1349 § 3, 2004: Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 610 § 6, 1984. Formerly 2.52.070.]
2.28.080 Penalty for certain ordinance violations.
(1) A person violating or failing to comply with any of the mandatory or prohibitory requirements of the ordinances of the city is punished in the manner prescribed in this section. It shall constitute a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which a violation of a provision of the ordinances of the city is committed, continued, or permitted by a person.
(2) If the offense is designated a “gross misdemeanor,” it is punished in the manner prescribed in RCW 9A.20.021(2), as presently constituted or as may be subsequently amended.
(3) If the offense is designated a “misdemeanor,” it is punished in the manner prescribed in RCW 9A.20.021(3), as presently constituted or as may be subsequently amended.
(4) If the offense is designated a “criminal offense,” it is punished in the manner of a gross misdemeanor.
(5) If the offense has not been designated a “gross misdemeanor,” “misdemeanor,” or “criminal offense,” it is punished in the manner prescribed for a misdemeanor.
(6) If the offense is designated a “civil infraction,” it is punished in the manner prescribed in the enacting ordinance. [Ord. 1135 § 2(7)(part), 1995; Ord. 1036 § 103, 1993: Ord. 610 § 8, 1984. Formerly 2.52.080.]
2.28.090 Setting compensation rates.
Repealed by Ord. 610. [Ord. 558 § 1, 1983. Formerly 2.52.090.]
2.28.100 Public defender standards.
(1) Adoption. The city hereby adopts the following standards for public defenders to ensure that indigent criminal defendants receive high-quality legal representation through a public defense system that efficiently and effectively protects the constitutional requirement of effective assistance of counsel.
(2) Contract. All indigent defense services shall be paid pursuant to a written contract between the indigent defense attorney(s) and the city, with input from judicial officers.
(3) Compensation. All indigent defense attorneys shall be reasonably compensated, taking into consideration the experience and training of the attorney. Attorneys who have a conflict of interest shall be required to select or compensate conflict counsel.
(4) Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel. All indigent defense contracts shall require that services be provided to all clients in a professional, skilled manner consistent with minimum standards set forth by the American Bar Association, applicable Washington State Bar Association standards, the Rules of Professional Conduct, case law and applicable court rules defining the duties of counsel and the rights of defendants. Counsel’s primary and most fundamental responsibility is to promote and protect the best interests of the client.
(5) Malpractice Insurance. Indigent defense attorneys shall maintain malpractice insurance with agreed-upon policy limits.
(6) Caseload Limits and Types of Cases. Caseloads shall be limited to ensure effective representation. An attorney should not allow his or her private law practice to interfere with the competent representation of indigent defendants.
The caseload standards adopted by the Washington State Bar Association, Washington Defender Association and/or American Bar Association shall be considered as guidelines. A “case” is defined as the filing of a document wherein a person is designated a defendant or respondent and an attorney is appointed by the court. Adjustments may be made wherein a full case is not attributed in the following nonexclusive circumstances:
(a) A bench warrant is issued before a case is resolved;
(b) Probation violation, extradition, restitution hearings, etc., that do not require a full-blown hearing;
(c) Diversions, continuances for dismissal, misdemeanor compromises or similar dispositions;
(d) Deferred prosecution or other similar procedure;
(e) Early dismissal by a prosecutor based on lack of evidence or standard plea offers, based on the prosecutor’s charging and plea bargaining practices or other reasons that dispose of a case without extensive litigation; or
(f) Withdrawal of counsel at an early stage of the case, due to conflict of interest or other reasons.
Attorneys providing indigent defense services, judicial officers and city administration shall monitor caseloads to assure adequate representation and progress in moving cases to final adjudication. The above-mentioned parties should not hesitate to confer and craft a remedy for dealing with caseload issues that materially affect representation of an indigent client. Excessive continuances, missed court dates, client complaints, etc., shall be addressed as soon as practicable.
(7) Services Other Than Counsel. Reasonable compensation for expert witnesses, investigators and other services necessary for an adequate preparation and presentation of the defense case shall be provided pursuant to Criminal Rule 3.1(f).
(8) Administrative Expenses. Attorneys shall be responsible for paying all administrative expenses of their office or firm not otherwise provided for in these standards or in a contract. Such costs may include law libraries, financial accounting, case management systems and other costs incurred in the day-to-day management of the contract. Attorneys shall maintain an office to maintain confidential meetings with clients.
(9) Reports of Attorney Activity and Vouchers. Attorneys on contract shall maintain a case reporting and management information system which includes the number and type of cases, and disposition of each case. Any such system shall be maintained independently from client files so as to disclose no privileged information. At least quarterly reports shall be submitted by the contract firm to the court and to the city administration.
A standardized voucher form shall be used by attorneys seeking payment for services rendered. Payment should be made at times agreed to by the parties, without regard to the number of cases closed in the period.
(10) Training. Attorneys shall participate in regular training programs in areas relating to their indigent defense practice.
Attorneys providing counsel to indigent accused should take the opportunity to attend courses that foster trial advocacy skills and to review professional publications and tapes.
(11) Supervision. Each attorney or firm providing indigent defense services should provide adequate supervision of attorneys providing indigent defense services.
(12) Substitution of Attorneys or Assignment of Contracts. The attorney or firm engaged by the respective city to provide indigent defense services shall not subcontract with another firm or attorney to provide representation without prior written approval and shall remain directly involved in the provision of representation. If the contract is with a firm or office, the respective city or judicial officer may request the names and experience levels of those attorneys who will actually be providing the services, to ensure they meet minimum qualifications. Any indigent defense contract shall address the procedures for new counsel taking over upon the conclusion of the contract to ensure a smooth transition upon nonrenewal or termination, with the minimal possible detriment to the indigent client.
(13) Limitations on Private Practice for Contract Attorneys. New contracts for indigent defense attorneys with private attorneys or firms may set limits on the number of private or special appointment cases. These limits shall be based on the percentage of a full-time caseload which the public defense cases represent. An attorney or firm rendering indigent defense services shall not allow his or her private practice or accept special appointments to diminish his or her ability to represent indigent clients he or she is obligated to serve by any contract.
(14) Disposition of Client Complaints. The following procedure shall be utilized for responding to client complaints: Complaints should first be directed to the attorney, firm or agency which provided representation. If the attorney and client cannot resolve the complaint amicably, the attorney shall ask the court to withdraw and substitute new counsel. The complaining client should be informed as to the disposition of his or her complaint within a reasonable period of time. If the client feels dissatisfied with the evaluation and response received, he or she should be advised of the right to complain to the Washington State Bar Association.
(15) Cause for Termination or Removal of Attorney. Contracts for indigent defense services should include the grounds for termination of the contract by the parties. Termination of an attorney’s contract should only be for good cause or as provided within the terms of the agreement between the city and firm or attorney. Good cause shall include the failure of the attorney to render adequate representation to clients; the wilful disregard of the rights and best interests of the client; the wilful disregard of the standards herein addressed; or violations of the RPCs.
The representation in an individual case establishes an inviolable attorney-client relationship. Removal of counsel from representation, therefore, should not occur over the objections of both the attorney and the client.
(16) Nondiscrimination. Neither the city, in its selection of an attorney, firm, or agency to provide indigent defense representation, nor the attorneys selected, in their hiring practices or in their representation of clients, shall discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, age, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, or handicap. Both the city and the contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local nondiscrimination requirements.
(17) Guidelines for Awarding Defense Contracts. The city shall award contracts for indigent defense services only after determining that the attorney or firm chosen can meet appropriate professional standards and qualifications. Under no circumstances will a contract be awarded on the basis of cost alone. Attorneys or firms seeking contracts for indigent defense services must demonstrate their ability to meet these standards.
Prosecutor and law enforcement officers shall not select the attorneys who will provide indigent defense services. [Ord. 1449 §§ 1 – 17, 2009.]
2.28.110 Municipal Court seal.
The Municipal Court shall have a seal which shall be the vignette of George Washington, with words “Seal of the Municipal Court of Des Moines, State of Washington” surrounding the vignette. [Ord. 1635 § 1, 2015.]
For statutory provisions regarding the establishment of city courts by cities of 400,000 or less population, see chapter 3.50 RCW.
Prior legislation: Ords. 112, 205, 346, 424, 426, 457, 486, 487, 519, and 558.