Chapter 3.107
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
Sections:
3.107.010 Findings and authority.
3.107.060 Imposition of transportation impact fees.
3.107.065 Option for deferred payment of transportation impact fees.
3.107.070 Computation of the transportation impact fee amount.
3.107.080 Alternative method of computation.
3.107.120 Appeals—Payment under protest.
3.107.130 Impact fee accounts.
3.107.180 Other transportation improvements.
3.107.010 Findings and authority.
The demand for transportation facilities is proportionate to the number of vehicle trips using the transportation system. The larger traffic volumes grow, the greater the demand for city transportation facilities. In order to offset the impacts of development on the city’s transportation system, the city has determined to levy transportation impact fees consistent with city standards as new development occurs. Impact fees are authorized under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the Growth Management Act (GMA) to help offset the cost of transportation capital facilities brought about by new growth and development. Impact fees imposed under this chapter will be used to design, engineer and construct transportation facilities that are consistent with the capital facilities and transportation elements of the Mukilteo comprehensive plan. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.020 Purpose.
A. The purpose of this chapter is to implement SEPA, the GMA and the capital facilities and transportation elements of the Mukilteo comprehensive plan by:
1. Ensuring that adequate transportation facilities are available to serve new development;
2. Maintaining the high quality of life in Mukilteo by ensuring that growth pays for growth and that service levels on the city’s transportation system are not adversely impacted by growth and new development activity; and
3. Establishing standards and procedures whereby new development pays its proportionate share of the cost of transportation facilities that are reasonably related to the new development, and whereby transportation facilities are jointly financed by public and private interests.
B. The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purpose in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.030 Definitions.
As used in this chapter, the following terms have the meanings set forth below:
“Capital facilities” means those transportation facilities or improvements addressed in the transportation and/or capital facilities elements of the Mukilteo comprehensive plan, as the same now exists or may be hereafter amended. Capital facilities costs include the cost of land acquisition, design, engineering, and construction, but exclude the cost of maintenance and operation.
“Capital facilities program (CFP)” means a six-year plan that is approved by the city council in order to finance the development of capital facilities necessary to support the projected population of Mukilteo over the six-year period. The city’s CFP is found in the capital facilities element of the Mukilteo comprehensive plan, as the same now exists or may be hereafter amended.
“City” means the city of Mukilteo, Washington.
“Developer” means an individual, group of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, municipal corporation, state agency, or other person proposing or undertaking development activity within the city.
“Development activity,” as the term relates to transportation impact fees, means any construction or expansion of a building, structure, or use, any changes in the use of a building or structure, or any changes in the use of land that created additional demand and need for public transportation facilities.
“Development approval” means any written authorization from the city that authorizes commencement of a development activity.
“Encumbered” means to reserve, set aside, or otherwise earmark the impact fees in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for transportation capital facilities. Impact fees shall be considered encumbered on a first-in, first-out basis.
“Existing development” means that development which physically exists or for which the developer has been issued a valid building permit as of the effective date of the first ordinance establishing this chapter.
“Impact fee” means a payment of money imposed upon new growth or development as a condition of development approval in order to pay for public transportation facilities needed to serve such new growth or development. “Impact fee” does not include any permit or application fee.
“New development” means any and all development for which a building permit is issued after the effective date of the first ordinance establishing this chapter.
“Owner” means the owner of record of real property, although when real property is being purchased under a real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered to be the owner of the real property if the contract is recorded.
“Pass-through traffic” means vehicle trips which both begin and end outside the city limits, i.e., that have no trip end within the city.
“P.M. peak-hour vehicle trips” means the total number of vehicle trips traveling to or from a development project during a consecutive sixty-minute period occurring sometime between the hours of two-thirty p.m. and six-thirty p.m. which experiences the highest number of vehicle trips traveling to and from the development project.
“Previously incurred system improvements” means system improvements that were accomplished in order to serve new growth and development.
“Prior system improvement deficiencies” means deficiencies in public transportation facilities serving existing development and that do not meet the adopted level of service.
“Project improvements” means site improvements and transportation facilities that are planned and designed to provide service for a particular development project and that are necessary for the use and convenience of the occupants or users of the project and are not system improvements. No transportation improvement or facility included in the capital facilities plan shall be considered a project improvement.
“Proportionate share” means that portion of the cost of public transportation facility improvements that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development.
“Public transportation facilities” means public streets and roads.
“Public works director” means the public works director of the city of Mukilteo.
“Service area” means a geographic area defined by the city or, in the case of facilities providing service to areas outside the city, by interlocal agreement, as being that area in which a defined set of public transportation facilities provide service to development within the area.
“System improvements” means public transportation facilities that are included in the capital facilities plan and are designed to provide service to service areas within the community at large, in contrast to project improvements. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.040 Service area.
The service area for the existing and proposed public transportation facilities of the city of Mukilteo is hereby defined as that area which is coextensive with the corporate boundaries of the city, as they now exist or as they may be amended through annexation or other means from time to time. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.060 Imposition of transportation impact fees.
A. Except as otherwise provided for herein, any person or entity who, after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, seeks approval for any development activity on land within the city of Mukilteo is hereby required to pay a transportation impact fee in the manner and the amount set forth in this chapter. At the applicant’s option, transportation impact fees for new single-family residential construction may be deferred as provided in Section 3.107.065.
B. No development approval shall be issued for any new development activity unless and until the transportation impact fee has been paid as provided in this chapter. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1148 § 1, 2006; Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.065 Option for deferred payment of transportation impact fees.
A. Application.
1. An applicant may request, at any time prior to building permit issuance, and consistent with the requirements of this chapter, to defer to final inspection the payment of any impact fee for a single-family dwelling unit.
2. The applicant shall submit to the city a written request to defer the payment of an impact fee for a specifically identified building permit. The applicant’s request shall identify, as applicable, the applicant’s corporate identity and contractor registration number, the full names of all legal owners of the property upon which the development activity allowed by the building permit is to occur, the legal description of the property upon which the development activity allowed by the building permit is to occur, the tax parcel identification number of the property upon which the development activity allowed by the building permit is to occur, and the address of the property upon which the development activity allowed by the building permit is to occur. All applications shall be accompanied by an administrative fee as provided for in the city’s fee resolution.
B. Determination of Impact Fee. The impact fee amount due under any request to defer payment of impact fees shall be based on the schedule in effect at the time the applicant provides the city with the information required in subsection A of this section.
C. Lien—Recording. Prior to the issuance of a building permit that is the subject of a request for a deferred payment of impact fee, all applicants and/or legal owners of the property upon which the development activity allowed by the building permit is to occur must sign a deferred impact fee payment lien in a form acceptable to the city attorney. The lien shall be recorded against the property subject to the building permit and be granted in favor of the city in the amount of the deferred impact fee. Any such lien shall be junior and subordinate only to one mortgage for the purpose of construction upon the same real property subject to the building permit. In addition to the administrative fee required in subsection A of this section, the applicant shall pay to the city the fees necessary for recording the lien agreement with the Snohomish County auditor.
D. Payment—Release of Lien.
1. The city shall not approve a final inspection until the impact fees identified in the deferred impact fee lien are paid in full.
2. Upon receipt of full payment of the deferred impact fee as identified in the deferred impact fee lien, the city shall execute a release of lien for the property. The property owner may, at his or her own expense, record the lien release.
E. Limitations.
1. In no case shall payment of the impact fee be deferred for a period of more than eighteen months from the date of building permit issuance.
2. An applicant is entitled to defer impact fees pursuant to this section for no more than twenty single-family dwelling unit building permits per year in the city. For purposes of this section, an “applicant” includes an entity that controls the applicant, is controlled by the applicant, or is under common control with the applicant.
F. Enforcement. In the event that the deferred impact fee is not paid within the time provided in this chapter, the city shall institute foreclosure proceedings under the process set forth in Chapter 61.12 RCW. Nothing in this section prohibits the city from seeking other administrative, legal or equitable remedies in the event of nonpayment. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016)
3.107.070 Computation of the transportation impact fee amount.
|
Impact Fee Calculation |
|
|---|---|
|
P.M. peak-hour trip generating areas |
|
|
(See Attachment A) |
|
|
|
P.M. Peak-Hour Trips |
|
A. Vacant lands within city |
1,129 |
|
B. Harbour Pointe area |
2,258 |
|
C. External growth |
2,985 |
|
Total: |
6,372 |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of the total for each generating area: |
|
|
A. Vacant lands within city |
17.7% |
|
B. Harbour Pointe area |
35.4% |
|
C. External growth |
46.8% |
|
|
|
|
Total estimated cost of projects necessary to accommodate growth in p.m. peak-hour trips: |
|
|
(See Attachment B) = $23,910,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact fee = (cost of projects) x (percentage of p.m. peak-hour trips from vacant lands) x (adjustment factor) / (p.m. peak-hour trips) |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact Fee = ($23,910,000) x (17.7%) x (0.50) |
|
|
1,129 trips |
|
|
= $1,874.26 |
|
|
Rounding: |
|
|
Impact fee = $1,875 per new p.m. peak-hour trip |
|
(Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.080 Alternative method of computation.
A. As an alternative to calculation of the transportation impact fee according to the formula set forth in Section 3.107.070, a developer may opt to prepare and submit an independent fee calculation study for the requested development activity to the public works director. Any such study shall be prepared at the developer’s sole cost and expense.
B. The independent fee calculation study shall comply with the following standards:
1. The study shall follow accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies.
2. The study shall use acceptable data sources and the data shall be comparable with the uses and intensities proposed for the proposed development activity.
3. The study shall comply with the applicable state laws governing transportation impact fees.
4. The study, including any data collection and analysis, shall be prepared and documented by professionals qualified in their respective fields.
5. The study shall show the basis upon which the independent fee calculation was made.
C. The public works director shall consider the independent fee calculation study submitted by the developer but is not required to accept such study if the public works director reasonably determines that the study is not accurate or reliable. The public works director may, in the alternative, require the person submitting the study to submit additional or different documentation for consideration. If the public works director decides that outside experts are needed to review the study, the developer shall be responsible for paying the cost of review by outside experts.
D. If an acceptable independent fee calculation study is not presented, the developer shall pay the impact fees based upon the process and schedule set forth in Section 3.107.070. If an acceptable independent fee calculation study is presented, the public works director may adjust the fee to that appropriate to the particular development activity. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.090 Credits.
A. Pursuant to RCW 82.02.060(3), a reasonable credit shall be allowed for the conveyance of land for, improvements to, or new construction of any transportation system improvements provided by a developer to public transportation facilities identified in the capital facilities element of the comprehensive plan and that are the subject of impact fees to be paid by the developer under this chapter. Any request for a credit against impact fees shall be made and decided no later than the approval of the permit triggering the imposition of impact fees.
B. The amount of the credit shall be the value of the land and improvements conveyed to the city; provided, that in no case shall the amount of the credit exceed the amount of the impact fee imposed on the development activity. If the value of the land and improvements exceeds the total transportation impact fees to be paid by the development, no impact fees shall be due. If the value of the land and improvements is less than the impact fees due, the developer will be required to pay the difference.
C. Credits shall not be transferable from one property, project, or development activity to another. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.100 Adjustments.
The public works director is authorized to adjust the impact fees to be calculated under this chapter where the developer demonstrates that unusual circumstances make the standard impact fee applied to such development unfair or unjust. The circumstances that form the basis for the adjustment shall not be circumstances that are generally applicable to similar land uses or to all development activity in the vicinity. Unusual circumstances may include that the development activity will have substantially less impact on the system improvements than other development activities in the same land use category. Any request for an adjustment shall be made no later than the time of the application triggering imposition of impact fees. Adjustments granted under this section shall not be transferable from one property, project or development activity to another. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.120 Appeals—Payment under protest.
A. Determinations made by the public works director pursuant to this chapter may be appealed to the city council by filing a written appeal with the city clerk within fourteen calendar days of the public works director’s decision. For purposes of computing the time to file an appeal, the day the decision is rendered shall not be included. The last day of the appeal period shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or a day designated by RCW 1.16.050 or by the city’s ordinances as a legal holiday, in which case it is excluded and the filing must be complete no later than the next business day. All appeals must be filed no later than four-thirty p.m. on the last day of the appeal period.
B. Appeals shall be accompanied by the nonrefundable appeal fee set forth in the city’s current fee resolution, and shall contain the following information:
1. The appellant’s name, address and telephone number; and
2. Identification of the application which is the subject of the appeal; and
3. The appellant’s statement describing his or her standing to appeal; and
4. The appellant’s statement of grounds for the appeal and the facts on which the appeal is based, specifically including, but not limited to, the appellant’s statement as to why principles of fairness require the granting of the appeal; and
5. The relief sought, including the specific nature and extent; and
6. A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the contents to be true, followed by the appellant’s signature.
C. The city council shall hold a hearing on the appeal and shall consider all relevant evidence submitted by the appellant and the public works director.
D. On the basis of the evidence submitted, the city council may modify the impact fee upon a determination that it is proper to do so based on principles of fairness. City council shall issue a written decision on the appeal.
E. Impact fees may be paid under protest in order to obtain a permit or other approval of development activity. If such fees are paid under protest, the permit or other approval shall not be withheld pending resolution of any pending appeal. If such fees are not paid, no permit or development approval shall be issued until any pending appeal is resolved and any fee determined as a result of the appeal is paid.
F. After all administrative appeals have been exhausted, a party may seek judicial review of the city’s final impact fee decision by filing an appropriate action in Snohomish County superior court within twenty-one calendar days after issuance of the final decision. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.130 Impact fee accounts.
A. Transportation impact fee accounts are hereby established for the purpose of depositing and maintaining the funds received under this chapter and any previously collected transportation mitigation amounts paid pursuant to SEPA or other authority.
B. The city finance department shall earmark all funds collected under this chapter and under such previous collections as to the person paying, the date paid, and the development or property for which paid. The account shall be separate from all other accounts of the city and shall be interest-bearing. All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purposes for which the impact fee was imposed. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.140 Use of impact fees.
A. Impact fees shall be expended solely for the system improvements described in Section 3.107.030 and in conformance with the capital facilities plan element or the transportation element of the Mukilteo comprehensive plan. Impact fees may be expended for land acquisition, required mitigation, construction, engineering, permitting, financing, and administrative expenses, repayment of system improvement costs previously incurred to the extent that new growth and development will be served by such system improvements, and any other expenses which could be capitalized and which are consistent with the capital facilities program. Impact fees shall not be used for maintenance or operations.
B. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are issued for the advanced provision of system improvements for which impact fees may be expended and where consistent with provisions of the bond covenants, impact fees may be used to pay debt service on such bonds or similar debt instruments to the extent that the facilities are consistent with the requirements of this section.
C. Impact fees collected under this chapter shall be expended or encumbered for a permissible use within ten years of the date they are received by the city, unless the city council finds that there exists an extraordinary and compelling reason for the fees to be held longer than ten years. Such a finding shall be made in writing.
D. Traffic mitigation amounts collected under the authority of SEPA and the voluntary agreement provisions of RCW 82.02.020 shall be expended or encumbered for a permissible use within five years of the date they are received by the city.
E. Funds may be used to provide refunds as described in Section 3.107.150. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.150 Impact fee refunds.
A. If a development approval for which an impact fee has been paid under this chapter expires without commencement of construction, then the developer shall be entitled to a refund, with interest, of the impact fee paid.
B. The current owner of property on which impact fees have been paid may receive a refund of such fees, or any portion thereof if the city has failed to expend or encumber the impact fees, or any applicable portion, within the time periods specified in Section 3.107.140.
C. The city shall notify potential claimants for impact fee refunds by first-class mail deposited with the United States postal service at the last known address of the said claimants.
D. A request for a refund must be submitted to the public works director in writing within one year of the date that the right to claim the refund arises or the date that the notice is given, whichever is later. Any impact fees that are not expended or encumbered and for which no application for refund has been made within the one-year period shall be retained and expended on the indicated capital facilities. Refunds under this subsection shall include interest earned on the impact fees; provided, that if the city’s failure to expend or encumber the fee within the time periods set forth in Section 3.107.140 is due to delay attributable to the developer of the project for which the fee was collected, the refund shall be without interest.
E. If the city terminates the impact fee requirements of this chapter, all unexpended or unencumbered funds, including interest earned, shall be refunded pursuant to this section. Upon a determination to terminate such impact fee requirements, the city shall publish a notice of such termination and the availability of refunds in the city’s official newspaper at least two times and shall notify all potential claimants by first-class mail at the last known address of claimants. A request for a refund must be submitted to the public works director in writing within one year of the date that the notice is given. Any impact fees for which no application for refund has been made within the one-year period shall be retained and expended on the indicated capital facilities. No notice shall be required if there are no unexpended or unencumbered balances within the account at the time of termination.
F. Any applicant who has paid the transportation impact fees required by this chapter for a development activity that would be exempt from the payment of such fees by Sections 3.107.160(A) and (E) shall be allowed a refund of such fees, without interest, upon timely application. Notification and availability of the refund shall be the same as provided for in subsection E of this section. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1148 § 3, 2006; Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.160 Exemptions.
The following development activities shall be exempted from payment of impact fees:
A. Rebuilding or replacement of an existing legally established building or structure where no additional p.m. peak-hour trips are generated over and above those that were generated by the previous building or structure.
B. Alteration or expansion:
1. Of an existing building where no additional p.m. peak-hour trips are generated and where the use is not changed; and/or
2. The construction of accessory buildings or structures where no additional p.m. peak-hour trips are generated.
C. Condominium projects in which existing dwelling units are converted into condominium ownership where no new dwelling units are created.
D. Previous mitigation has been provided under one of the following circumstances:
1. The development activity is exempt from the payment of an impact fee pursuant to RCW 82.02.100, due to mitigation of the same system improvement under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); or
2. The development activity’s transportation impacts have been fully mitigated pursuant to a condition of plat or PRD approval to pay fees, dedicate land or construct or improve public transportation facilities, unless the condition of the plat or PRD approval provides otherwise; provided, that the condition of the plat or PRD approval predates the effective date of fee imposition as provided herein; or
3. The development activity’s transportation impacts have been mitigated pursuant to a voluntary agreement entered into with the city to pay fees, dedicate land or construct or improve public transportation facilities, unless the terms of the voluntary agreement provide otherwise; provided, that the agreement predates the effective date of fee imposition as provided herein; or
4. The development activity is within the Harbour Pointe area of the city and SEPA-related transportation mitigation has been provided through the Harbour Pointe master plan and associated road improvement mitigation agreements.
E. Development activities for which a complete application was filed with the city prior to July 27, 2005. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1148 § 2, 2006; Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.170 Annual report.
The city finance department, in conjunction with the public works director, shall prepare an annual report to the city council showing the source and amount of all monies collected, earned, or received and the transportation system improvements that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees imposed under this chapter. The report may be part of an existing annual report or may be a separate report. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
3.107.180 Other transportation improvements.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent the city from requiring the dedication of land for, contribution of funds toward, and/or the design, engineering, and construction of transportation improvements as a condition of any development approval where such improvements are necessary as a direct result of the proposed development. (Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
|
|
Land Use |
Area (Acres or Lots) |
ITE Manual Land Use Code |
P.M. Peak-Hour Rate |
P.M. Peak Total |
Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A. |
Trip Generation from Vacant Lands in Mukilteo (Harbour Pointe exempt) |
|||||
|
|
Commercial or Mixed Use |
17.4 |
750 |
28.3 |
492 |
|
|
|
Industrial |
53.1 |
110 |
7.26 |
386 |
|
|
|
Single-Family Residential |
249 |
210 |
1.01 |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
1,129 |
17.7% |
|
B. |
Harbour Pointe Additions |
From 2004 Comp. Plan Summation, Page 135 (Corrected) |
||||
|
|
SECTOR 20 (unit) |
108 |
SFR |
1.01 |
109 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 20 (sf) |
345,555 |
INDUSTRIAL |
0.0009 |
311 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 3 (sf) |
286,775 |
RETAIL |
0.0028 |
803 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 15 (unit) |
166 |
MFR |
0.6 |
100 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 15 (sf) |
61,000 |
COMMERCIAL |
0.0028 |
171 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 15 (sf) |
304,920 |
INDUSTRIAL |
0.0009 |
274 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 11 (unit) |
80 |
MFR |
0.6 |
48 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 11 (sf) |
100,000 |
INDUSTRIAL |
0.0009 |
90 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 7 (sf) |
318,320 |
INDUSTRIAL |
0.0009 |
286 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 13 (sf) |
26,400 |
COMMERCIAL |
0.0015 |
40 |
|
|
|
SECTOR 13 (unit) |
52 |
MFR |
0.5 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
2,258 |
35.4% |
|
C. |
External Growth* |
|
2,985 |
46.8% |
|
|
|
|
Total P.M. Peak-Hour Trips Due to Growth |
6,372 |
100.0% |
|||
|
|
(Increase) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*From 2004 Transportation Plan, City of Mukilteo, Appendix F, Page 157 |
||||||
|
TEN-W memo of 2/26/04, 9,865 external trips – 6,880 external trips = 2,985 external trips |
||||||
(Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)
|
Project No. |
Project Name |
From |
To |
Estimated Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
N2 |
Harbour Pointe Blvd. – South Extension |
SR 525 |
121st St. SW |
$3,520,000 |
|
N4 |
Harbour Reach Ext. |
Harbour Pt. Blvd. |
Beverly Park Rd. |
$10,800,000 |
|
R1 |
5th Street |
SR 525 |
East City Limits |
$3,500,000 |
|
R3 |
Cyrus Way |
SR 525/Russell Road |
SR 525 Evergreen Dr. |
$2,100,000 |
|
R4 |
Chennault Beach Rd. |
SR 525 |
47th Ave. West |
$700,000 |
|
R6 |
44th Ave. West |
76th St. SW |
SR 526/84th St. SW |
$1,300,000 |
|
R7 |
SR 525 |
450 feet north of 88th |
200 feet south of 88th |
$490,000 |
|
S1 |
SR 525/Goat Trail Rd. Signal |
|
|
$500,000 |
|
S2 |
SR 525/76th St. SW Signal |
|
|
$500,000 |
|
S6 |
Beverly Park Rd. Signal |
|
|
$500,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
$23,910,000 |
(Ord. 1387 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2016: Ord. 1132 § 1 (part), 2005)